<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can I optimise my frames site? Frames? What is the point</title>
	<link>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/general-stuff/how-can-i-optimise-my-frames-site-frames-what-is-the-point</link>
	<description>Web Marketing With an Old Welsh Guy Feel OWG is the Google Expert</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Old Welsh Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/general-stuff/how-can-i-optimise-my-frames-site-frames-what-is-the-point#comment-439</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/general-stuff/how-can-i-optimise-my-frames-site-frames-what-is-the-point#comment-439</guid>
					<description>What about Iframes indeed. The problem with Iframes is that although they can get spidered, they will not appear as part of the page. They will appear in the serps as orphan files with no link benefit in or out . So for this reason they are not really seo friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Iframes indeed. The problem with Iframes is that although they can get spidered, they will not appear as part of the page. They will appear in the serps as orphan files with no link benefit in or out . So for this reason they are not really seo friendly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/general-stuff/how-can-i-optimise-my-frames-site-frames-what-is-the-point#comment-396</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/general-stuff/how-can-i-optimise-my-frames-site-frames-what-is-the-point#comment-396</guid>
					<description>The problems with frames has been known for a long time as you say but what about IFRAME? There are some occasions where a frame is useful for the design and an IFRAME tag is the obvious solution, but how does Google and co handle this? Great blog btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems with frames has been known for a long time as you say but what about IFRAME? There are some occasions where a frame is useful for the design and an IFRAME tag is the obvious solution, but how does Google and co handle this? Great blog btw.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
