<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do you know if a site is relevent when link building?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/web-marketing/how-do-you-know-if-a-site-is-relevent-when-link-building/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/web-marketing/how-do-you-know-if-a-site-is-relevent-when-link-building</link>
	<description>Web Marketing With an Old Welsh Guy Feel OWG is the Google Expert - The SEO Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The SEO Expert in Chester</title>
		<link>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/web-marketing/how-do-you-know-if-a-site-is-relevent-when-link-building/comment-page-1#comment-265384</link>
		<dc:creator>The SEO Expert in Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/web-marketing/how-do-you-know-if-a-site-is-relevent-when-link-building#comment-265384</guid>
		<description>A fantastic read and now nearly four and a half years later, from how I took it, it&#039;s all very much the same in terms of relevance and trustrank - OWG would you agree that this is still how it all stands? If you were to be writing the same post today, and not years back when you did, would you say it would read the same? If not what would be the major differences/additions?
Cheers,
Stuart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fantastic read and now nearly four and a half years later, from how I took it, it&#8217;s all very much the same in terms of relevance and trustrank &#8211; OWG would you agree that this is still how it all stands? If you were to be writing the same post today, and not years back when you did, would you say it would read the same? If not what would be the major differences/additions?<br />
Cheers,<br />
Stuart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self Made Minds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That&#8217;s a wrap! - Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/web-marketing/how-do-you-know-if-a-site-is-relevent-when-link-building/comment-page-1#comment-33961</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Made Minds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That&#8217;s a wrap! - Friday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldwelshguy.co.uk/web-marketing/how-do-you-know-if-a-site-is-relevent-when-link-building#comment-33961</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s an old article but a great bookmark, Old Welsh Guy guy tell how to find relevance when link building. A nice and clear explanation so worth a read as well as a more recent article on what is a professional SEO?. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s an old article but a great bookmark, Old Welsh Guy guy tell how to find relevance when link building. A nice and clear explanation so worth a read as well as a more recent article on what is a professional SEO?. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

